Is this from stock …
Is this from stock symbol SYMW?

Looks like diamont …
Looks like diamont aircraft

there is at least …
there is at least one are where the profound ignorance of 99% of Americans matches their profound ignorance of energy and that is on the subject of 9-11-01.
so, it is TECHNICALLY feasible to fly a plane using Hydrogen as fuel?
Where does the Hydrogen come from? is the energy used to create this fuel less than or equal to the energy that will be obtained from the Hydrogen ?

no great stretch to make most Americans believe fire caused the total DEMOLITION of World Trade Center 7.

1) The size of …
1) The size of wings are not enough for the solar panels to fit over. It takes A LOT of panels to create energy and it won’t power the plane with that much. 2) payload would be massive. 3) wings are used to store fuel and the fuel would have no place to go… And of course I already mentioned solar panels have to be in large quantities to produce that kind of power. 4) If you are talking about electrics in cabin such as lights, that’s because the engines act like generators.

NASA has a …
NASA has a prototype called Helios. Its slow and huge and can’t carry much wait. But cool anyhow. Search for “helios” or “solar plane”

i would like to see …
i would like to see a Aircraft just run on electric

Solar powered …
Solar powered flight has been achieved. Solar Challenger crossed the English Channel & reached 11,000′

Nanosolar has come …
Nanosolar has come out with a thin solar film which could be used. It’s even more solar efficient than heavy solar panels.

You are right, no solar panel or film would generate enough power for take-off by themselves, but if you used them to charge a bank of batteries or capacitors, then those could power the take-off, and then hopefully the “solar wings” would generate enough power to sustain a long distance flight.

This of course wouldn’t be a night flyer.

I Still can’t …
I Still can’t figure out why the don’t put solar panels over the wings. It’s so simple, but nobody seems to be doing it.

freddytuber – ” …
freddytuber – “Hydrogen=DEAD END!”

For now.

They said it was impossible to fly, impossible to go into space, impossible to influence the weather and impossible to produce a worldwide public ‘internet’.

They were proved wrong every time. Just because something seems ‘out of reach’ (NOT IMPOSSIBLE), doesn’t mean we won’t eventually get there.

You can say it is impossible to turn water into wine (with the exception of Christ) because of the knowledge of today.

that’s cause the …
that’s cause the oil companies don’t want them to use anything except oil products S

“Boeing does not …
“Boeing does not envisage that fuel cells will ever provide primary power” – why not? The fuel cell on the Honda FCX Clarity provides 100Kw. That’s enough to power a small town.

“The electrolysis …
“The electrolysis used to convert water to hydrogen is 70% efficient,”

And where is the electricity going to come from? Coal?

“Batteries use chemicals that are heavy and extremely corrosive. Fuel cells are not heavy nor corrosive”

What about the weight of the tank(s) to store the compressed hydrogen?