Its too early to …
Its too early to say what is really happening except I and others have been able to to reduce the current draw from the power supply by better than a 2:1 ratio, in other words its a series circuit with cell current 8.0 of amps but the power supply draw is around 3.7 amps.The 1:1 transformer can’t explain the current gain. So I should stay quiet right and not post my findings? If you watched my 2 videos on this, you would see and hear what going on at the resonance points. More work is needed.

My analog scope is …
My analog scope is not working or that would have been used.. I must say that a level & bias controls are most critical to get any MOSFET to oscillate, if my lab box hadn’t processed those features, I would have not found this effect. I am not the only one who has seen this, watch one of the reply videos from Germany. I have built 5 of the modified “Lawton” circuits and the the current reduction in the power supply leg happens with all 5 different wound inductors. The fast diode is a must.

I’ve built the …
I’ve built the circuit several times, hardwired and on breadboards. Several other people have also built the circuit and have simulated it in Spice, for example. I am afraid that, based on these builds and my experience with the 555 and 556, that the conclusion is still that you have made an error. If you research 555 circuit design you will see that the component values given will not even theoretically approach a short ON duty cycle. And no “limiter” is needed if the circuit is working right.

STOP There is a …
STOP There is a problem. Yes I double checked my circuit, and NO there was no mistakes in wiring but there was a problem that changes the results, a mistake not on my part but an incorrect design of the sound circuit in my HP omputer’s designed audio card section . It inverts the signal. What is positive is now negative. Wanting to find out why other people were having problems, I moved the circuit to three more clone computers with different cards. All showed its was 97% not 3% duty cycle……

And of course if …
And of course if you would like to see what real research on this circuit looks like, you can look at my (TinselKoala) videos concerning it. Sorry, you won’t be seeing any spaghetti circuits, but you will see coherent oscilloscope traces that actually convey information, and you will see components and configurations tested against each other, and actual power and energy flow calculations. What you won’t see on my videos is any evidence of “free energy” or COP over 17, as Ainslie has claimed.

If you are new to …
If you are new to this circuit, I am sorry for not doing a more complete video inside and out. That will be done with the next video. I can’t say that her circuit that it will be better than my modified “Lawton” circuit. Using her’s will go from a duty cycle of 50% down to as little as 3.7%.
There is work with the “Rodin” coil that allows a perfect sine wave recovery with a B field winding when a sharp pulse is applied to the primary winding….so again there maybe more power reduction possible.

Do you have any …
Do you have any idea what this circuit is supposed to do? I mean, what is the point? It just switches the MOSFET on and off… There are no inductors or anything that would cause AC through anything for “resonance”. I’m an EE, so I understand the circuit pretty well – I just don’t understand the intent.

Can this work with …
Can this work with a dry cell where the plates are so tight the can not act like tubes,if that makes sense.